Comparison of inferred spikes over a range of λ values and electrophysiology spikes from Eshel et al. Mean population firing rates from inferred spikes around presentation of unexpected reward when λ is selected to target a 4, 6, or 8 Hz average estimated firing rate (n = 65 cells). S7 Fig: Tuning rate comparison for Pavlovian experiment. Left: Estimated decay rates for pacemaker cells for GCaMP6f at 30☌ (n = 3 cells median decay rate = 0.974, Q1 = 0.968, Q3 = 0.981), GCaMP6f at 37☌ (n = 7 cells median decay rate = 0.969, Q1 = 0.963, Q3 = 0.982), and GCaMP6m at 37☌ (n = 1 cell decay rate = 0.986). Cells with <10% of spikes occurring within a burst were excluded from group analysis, since they featured little or no phasic activity. Percent of spikes that occurred within a burst for all recordings in the GCaMP6f at 30☌, GCaMP6f at 37☌, and GCaMP6m at 37☌ groups. This was chosen as the cut-off for inclusion in in vitro analysis. A burst was defined by a series of at least 3 spikes with 10% of spikes within a burst. Percent of spikes that occurred within a burst in a previously collected in vivo electrophysiology dataset (Eshel et al. S1 Fig: Identification of pacemaker cells by absence of phasic activity, and decay statistics for pacemaker cells.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |